Tuesday, July 29, 2008

Post 60. Since the the Beginning, There Has Existed a Solution.

Relationship Between Sexual Language,
Curves( Bodily), Curves ( Mathematical)
and the Word " Solution ".
Perhaps readers are wondering why a theologian who cares about ethics, morality and belief in God has displayed such a, to some of us, wordly, disturbing and suggestive exposure of
" The ( Covered ) Solution to All Continuities ".
Please note oh readers of mine that I am just a 'barbuto', that is a layman, a secular theologian, not a Priest, and that I am thus enabled to sit on and experiment about the dividing line between the divine (sacred) and the diabolical (profane), thus being better equipped to hit the Opponent, hopefully, on the horns. This requires flexibility, freedom, tactical ability, aided of course, by God's Grace, which is always essential. I cannot be more specific as, some of us, not being trained professionals and qualified, as even I am, may become too excited, and/or upset, and am limiting myself to use the elegant, suggestive yet cathartic and exhorcising definition by Rabelais when narrating the "Story of the Lady of a Certain Island in Pantagruel's Lands ", who scared the Demon away by attributing to the powers of her husband whom the Devil had come to take away to Hell, the presence in her body of the above said " Solution ".
The stout, well-endowed Lady had in fact shown it to the Devil, uncovered.
Rabelais was a french Roman Catholic Priest of the Renaissance ca. 1500A.D. who wrote educational moralising Comedies ( like Boccaccio and later Molieres, etc.) and whom, together with the Devils of his times, we, who have progressed in the fields of 'rolly-poky' might find to-day corny, naive and too easily amazed or distressed, as neither he nor his Devils ever had the opportunity to appreciate, halas, XXX-rated films. Yes even devils need progress and enlightenment.
I cannot agree though,with this simplistic, arrogant opinion of my modern readers, as I am always pleasantly if worshipfully and humbly amazed by that great solution, a miracle of ingenuity and creativity everyone appears to take for granted and belittle, even abuse in swears and jokes, which God Himself/Herself/ITSELF makes with great love, skill, care, concentration and satisfaction, and this attitude and reverence of mine does is not affected by knowledge of or indulgence in XXX-rated films.
But I am a Believer, and that makes a great difference.
Hence the "solution's " potentially charismatic, cathartic, exhorcising powers for those who believe and appreciate God, and Creation as the Artistic Workshop 'par excellence'. The 'solution' represents in fact Art & Aesthetics of a most consummate & infinitely divine skill.In fact those who cannot comprehend this truth are just big constipated, mortified, anorexic Arabic Zeros, of which subject I have also written at length( see List of Posts). However,as for all the good things in life, the " Solution" being, like all God's works, suspended between the divine ( sacred) and the demonic ( diabolic), the " Solution ", like many other wonders of Creation, can have quite the opposite effects on many of us, as Rabelais said it had on his Devils, as even the Scriptures can, which mix evil and good for the purpose of education and the teaching of ethics and morality.
I also suppose that the use of the word "Solution" by Rabelais is rather surprisingly advanced and amazing, since it anticipates of centuries Descarte 's Mathematical works on Analytical Geometry, Newton's " Calculus and Differential Equations ", etc..
In talking about equations of geometrical or mathemtical curves one says in fact that a solution exists when the Curves intersect. I hope this explains my favouring and admiring this beautiful display of charisma, catharsis and exhorcism. Good on you,
Thou beautiful, young, english lady-acrobat!
I have not been able to contact her though.
My e-mail address is: gensferreria@bigpond.com

Honny Soit Quy Mal Ye Pense!

Thursday, July 24, 2008

Post 59. Waste Needs not be a Barrier to Nuclear Energy Production.

( Reportage by the blogger from "Stumble Upon" ).
The “Problem” of Waste in Context
The low volume of nuclear waste as compared to wastes from coal-fired power production is what attracted the early conservationists who saw nuclear power as an ideal way to protect our ecosystem. A 1,000 Megawatt coal-fired power plant produces solid wastes at a rate of 1,800 pounds per minute, waste that includes 19 toxic metals such as arsenic, carcinogens such as benzopyrene, and mutagens from the respirable coal fly ash. A coal-fired plant also produces 50 times the radioactive emissions of an average nuclear power plant. For those concerned about such things, going nuclear even reduces CO2 emissions by 600 pounds per second.
The coal-fired plant also produces 30 pounds of sulfur dioxide per second (said to cause acid rain, amongst other problems) and as much nitrous oxide as 200,000 automobiles. Each year some 60,000 fellow citizens die early deaths from exposure to byproducts of coal combustion, according to studies by the Brookhaven National Laboratory, Divisions of Atmospheric Sciences and of Biomedical and Environmental Sciences. Note that unlike wastes from nuclear power plants, all products of coal combustion are either sent into the atmosphere or into landfills where they remain toxic forever.
Even with that extensive list of negatives, the danger from coal-fired power plants pales in comparison to a far more serious danger — a lack of access to electrical energy. If we opt for inconsistent sources of energy, such as wind power and solar generation instead of fossil or nuclear power, we have only to wait for the invariable brownouts and blackouts that will be the result. We see the toll from a lack of energy each time we have a natural disaster where people flee to the nearest place where the comfort, sanitation, and safety provided by electrical power is available. We also see this dramatically in countries where work is performed primarily by human labor and the combustion of wood is a primary source of energy — and the population lives in the squalor that we always see under such conditions. The surest way to a low standard of living is energy poverty.
What Are Nuclear Wastes?
There are many answers to this question, including smoke detectors in the landfill or gloves worn by a nuclear medicine physician. (A failed nuclear-waste disposal law proposed in the Colorado legislature would have made a trip to the restroom a criminal offense since urine is always radioactive with Potassium-40.) Here, however, we are addressing only the waste products from commercial nuclear power generating plants.
The fuel for a Light Water Reactor (LWR) as typically used in the United States is uranium — a relatively plentiful metal in the Earth’s crust averaging three grams per ton, which is three times that of mercury, 36 times the abundance of silver, and outstrips gold by a factor of 675. Once the ore is mined, the percentage of the fissionable U-235 isotope is “enriched” to some 3.5 percent compared to its natural occurrence of 0.7 percent within the predominant U-238 isotope. To fuel a reactor, finger-sized pellets of enriched uranium held in special tubing are inserted into the reactor core along with control rods of neutron-absorbing materials. Plain water is a critical component of any LWR as it serves as a coolant, a heat-transfer agent, and a moderator to slow down neutrons so they can be captured by the U-235 isotopes causing them to fission or split into a number of new elements.
The new elements created when the uranium atom “splits” are called the daughters* of the reaction and consist of a number of isotopes that run the gamut from being highly radioactive — hence spawning future radioactive disintegrations — to being stable and nonradioactive. The radioactive daughters and their progeny are considered high-level wastes. They consist of about 3 percent of the volume of spent fuel and amount to approximately 7.5 cubic feet (about a quarter of a cubic yard) from a year’s production from a 1,000 Megawatt power plant — considered to provide the electricity needs for 750,000 homes.
In rating the long-term dangers from these radioactive waste products, one must consider their half lives, i.e., the time required for an isotope to lose half its radioactivity. For example, radioactive iodine with an atomic weight of 131 (I-131) has a half life of about eight days, meaning a sample of I-131 will emit half of its initial radiation after eight days. In just over a month — 32 days — it will have lost 15/16th of its original intensity. After 30 half lives it is considered (by definition) to have completely disappeared.
The table below lists the half lives of significant radionuclides** found in spent nuclear fuel.
10.7 years
5.3 days
28.1 years
66.7 hours
8.1 days
30.2 years
285 days
What About the Other 97 Percent?
We have addressed the 3 percent of spent fuel that can be considered extremely dangerous high-level waste, because of the intensity at which it releases its radiation. But we have also seen from the preceding table that the rapid decay of its components lessens its danger to relatively short periods of time. About 97 percent of spent fuel is not waste at all, but valuable uranium and plutonium that can and should be recycled for use as fuel. It seems odd that we are enjoined by “environmentalists” to recycle paper — a truly renewable resource — but be forbidden by government decree to recycle radioactive fuel that is many times more expensive than gold. After chemically removing the high-level wastes, the recoverable isotopes in spent fuels and their half lives are:
710 million years
4.5 billion years
24.4 thousand years†
6.6 thousand years†
13.2 years†
Note that except for plutonium-240 and -241, these recyclable isotopes have very long half-lives and they emit their radiation slowly — so slowly, in fact, that they can safely be handled with bare hands. But there is no need for the public to come into contact with any of these since they can be used immediately as nuclear fuel. Already in LWRs, plutonium transmuted from U-238 provides nearly a third of the generated electrical energy. Stockpiled weapons-grade plutonium is being mixed with uranium in a “mixed oxide fuel” or MOX and “burned up” as fuel in the reactor. How better to beat a sword into a plowshare?
So why doesn’t the United States, like other countries possessing nuclear power, reprocess its fuel, removing the high-level radionuclides and reusing the uranium and plutonium isotopes? It is owing to the perceived — rather misperceived — dangers of the plutonium in the “spent fuel.” In 1977, the Carter administration canceled the Barnwell, South Carolina, reprocessing plant then nearing completion because of an exaggerated danger of terrorists stealing our nuclear fuel and chemically separating the plutonium from the uranium in order to build nuclear weapons with it.‡ France, Germany, Japan, and Russia continued with their reprocessing facilities and have assured themselves sources of readily available nuclear fuel for the foreseeable future. Our reprocessing efforts were limited to military purposes.
How Dangerous Are Nuclear Wastes?
Nuclear power plant wastes come in two distinct varieties: the dangerously radioactive daughters that are the remnants of the fission reaction, and the remaining recyclable isotopes that can be “burned” as fuel in the reactors to produce heat, steam, and electricity. Those opposed to nuclear power would have us confuse these two. A nuclear physics axiom is: “In general, the higher a radionuclide’s specific activity, the shorter its half life (decay rate), and the more ‘radioactive’ it is when compared to one with a lower specific activity.” If the “specific activity” stuff seems a bit confusing, you might think of short half-life isotopes to behave like gasoline thrown on the campfire, while the long half-life isotopes are analogous to the methane that seeps slowly up in the bayou and glows on those still, dark nights. High-level wastes give up their energy in a short period of time and then become stable and harmless, while the unused fuel (uranium and plutonium) are so weakly radioactive that their emanations are only dangerous in the minds of those who are dead set against nuclear power.
How long does it take for high-level wastes to become safe? For those interested in a definitive answer to this question, Bernard Cohen’s article “The Disposal of Radioactive Wastes From Fission Reactors” in the June 1977 issue of Scientific American is a classic that delves deeply in to the subject. However, there are ways to attack the question using logic. The daughters of fission reactions are not only radioactively hot but are also thermally hot, since the energy from the decay is converted into heat energy. These decay products begin very hot and cool as they lose radioactivity. The decrease in the heat produced can therefore be equated to the decrease in radioactivity. A canister of waste that produces 30,000 watts of heat energy when removed (after one year) from a power plant cooling pond would have dropped to about 3,000 watts in 10 years, to 300 watts in 100 years, and to a barely detectable 3 watts in 1,000 years. We can see then that the radioactivity of the waste canister has decreased to 1/10,000th its initial value and is not likely to require the services of armed guards 24/7 for 100,000 years, as the more vocal anti-nuclear activists would have one believe.
Where Do We Bury Virginia?
Another interesting way for us to assess the dangers of radiation is to compare the radiation levels found in nuclear plant wastes to those of material found in nature. Numerous studies dating from the 1970s show that ores from which the uranium for fuel was mined have the same amount of radioactivity that nuclear wastes will emit after being sequestered from 400 to 900 years, depending on the quality of the ores and the timing of a power plant’s refueling cycles. If we used the same philosophy about naturally occurring radioisotopes as we do nuclear power plant wastes, we would have to dig up, encase, and rebury the State of Virginia because of the large uranium deposits that have been found there. (And you can be certain Senator Harry Reid, whose fear-mongering about nuclear wastes knows no bounds, would not allow Virginia to be buried in Nevada!)
We don’t attempt to sequester naturally occurring radioactive pitchblende and similar ores to protect humans and animals from cancers and mutations, nor should we. They’ve always been there. Many states besides Virginia — e.g., New Mexico, Wyoming, Colorado, Utah, Texas, Arizona, Florida, Washington, and South Dakota — have ore deposits that are sufficiently concentrated for commercial mining, without harm to the population or causing radioactive pollution of the groundwater. And, for the record, these naturally occurring ores aren’t vitrified, encased in stainless steel, or stored in a dry environment.
Yucca Mountain
In the late 1950s, the National Academy of Science looked into the then-upcoming nuclear-waste disposal situation. At the time reprocessing of the fuel elements was a “given”; thus, it was just the high-level, short half-life decay products that were being considered as nuclear waste. Scientists decided that vitrifying them (making them into glass), encasing them in stainless-steel containers, and burying the canisters in geological formations that hadn’t seen moisture in millions of years was the best way to keep them out of the biosphere and eliminate the possibilities of groundwater contamination. This also allowed for retrieval of the valuable radionuclides if that became desirable in the future.
In 1978, the Department of Energy began studying Yucca Mountain, a 4,950-foot ridge in the uninhabited desert 80 miles northwest of Las Vegas, as a site for the long-term storage of high-level nuclear wastes that by now were considered to include the recyclable fuel components. The facility, which has already been paid for by the nuclear power industry and its rate payers, was expected to begin accepting nuclear wastes in 1998. This did not happen due to a bitter fight over the issues of transportation dangers and the firm opposition by the anti-nuclear activists to even the most stringent safety measures to prevent migration of the waste products into the groundwater.
Yucca is now scheduled to begin receiving spent fuel in 2017, making it possible that some scientists and engineers will have spent their entire careers studying and constructing the repository. (In comparison, it took engineers and workers seven years to construct the 31-mile tunnel beneath the English Channel.) Yet even the 2017 start date is in jeopardy due to opposition from anti-nuclear activists and those who are swayed by their rhetoric.
Somehow we’re expected to believe that rains will suddenly come to the desert, with water rushing through 2,500 feet of solid rock, dissolving the stainless steel shells of the glassified waste, leaching radioactive materials from the glass, and then gushing through another 1,500 feet of rock to the water table. Fast forward 100,000 years where some civilization with the technology to drill wells through several thousands of feet of rock will drink that water — water that would be only a fraction as radioactive as well water in parts of Maine or in health spas all over Europe. As noted, in much less than 100,000 years — 400 to 900 years to be precise — the waste will be no more radioactive that the natural ores that were mined for nuclear fuel.
To even imagine that a stainless-steel canister encasing glassified wastes and stored in a dry environment that has been studied in every particular for over 30 years would deteriorate seems a foolish prediction when there are innumerable cases of unprotected iron fasteners and structural members dating from the Middle Ages that are still serviceable after hundreds of years of exposure to wear, tear, and the elements.
Statistical Deception
The underlying cause of the nuclear-waste “problem” is an exaggerated fear of radiation. We have been conditioned for many years to accept the premise that even the slightest bit of radiation is dangerous — a premise that is not borne out by any experimental evidence.
It is certainly true that high doses of radiation can sicken or kill, and lower but still very substantial exposures can increase one’s propensity for developing cancer. But contrary to “common knowledge,” examination of the data shows that low levels of ionizing radiation often have a beneficial effect on human health known as hormesis — a fact that many scientists are striving to make public with little help from an uninformed and generally anti-nuclear news media. There is a very close parallel between ultra-violet (non-ionizing) radiation from exposure to sunshine and nuclear (ionizing) radiation. While extreme exposure to sunlight can lead to sunstroke and death, and lesser amounts cause sunburn and increase chances of skin cancer, moderate sunshine stimulates our bodies to create vitamin D that is necessary for good health.
We see this same phenomenon with trace elements such as arsenic and many vitamins. It is not unexpected then to see the same human reaction to ionizing radiation.
We have been deceived into believing that all radiation is bad because of the United States’ policy reliance on the “linear no-threshold” theory, or LNT, which states that if large amounts of something cause death or sickness, fractional amounts of the same thing cause proportional amounts of death or sickness. If the LNT were applied to falling as it is to radiation, we might note that 100 percent of those falling onto concrete from 100 feet are killed, but only 50 percent of those falling from 50 feet die. With these data we would linearly extrapolate to say that 10 percent falling from 10 feet and one percent of those falling from one foot would die. Armed with this “linear no-threshold falling theory,” we could confidently assert that jumping rope should be banned on all school playgrounds since statistically anyone making 100 one-foot jumps would die.
Neither experience nor evidence supports LNT theory, yet this same statistical ploy is used to make very small exposures of radiation to large numbers of individuals appear deadly. In 2005, by unanimous vote, both the French Academy of Medicine and the French Academy of Science deplored the use of this dose-response methodology in predicting effects of low-dose radiation. It is high time that the radiation professionals in this country did likewise, and many are doing just that. Unfortunately, the fact that thousands of workers in nuclear industries are outliving their unexposed peers is not considered newsworthy, but a leak of three quarts of reactor coolant water with less radioactivity than salad dressing makes the front page as a catastrophe.
Radioactivity surrounds us. Human beings and all we come into contact with contain radioisotopes. Uranium in the soil will still be radioactive in 10 billion years when our sun runs out of hydrogen. It is a natural part in our universe. To fear it is like fearing the warmth of a fireplace just because fire can also burn down the house. Yet people are still paralyzed with fright because few in this country understand anything about the measurement of radiation or its effects. Until we do we are defenseless against the posturing of radical environmentalists and destined to eventually lose the most incredible source of clean, safe, and reliable energy that man has ever been fortunate enough to enjoy.

* These daughters, if gathered together and weighed, would total a little less than the original uranium atom — and it is that “little less” that has been converted into energy according to Einstein’s famous E=mc2.
** Even these high-level “wastes” are valuable products for industry and medical diagnostics and treatment. Molybdenum-99 is the “cow” or source for producing Technetium-99 used in 30,000 “imagings” in European hospitals everyday.
† Not found in original fuel assemblies, only in recycled fuel.
‡ For why reactor-grade plutonium is not suitable for nuclear weapons, see “Iran and ‘the Bomb,’” October 16, 2006. This article is available online at www.thenewamerican.com/node/1749.
Transporting Wastes
Among the manufactured concerns of the anti-nuclear lobby is the hazard of used-fuel transportation. For those who haven’t driven on the interstate highway system lately, there are already (gasp) hazardous materials being shipped. Nuclear-fuel shipments would amount to less than one-thousandth of one percent of the 1.2 million daily shipments of hazardous materials.
Nuclear Energy Institute Executive Vice President Angie Howard points out that shipments of used nuclear fuel “have been completed safely since the mid-1960s and will continue to be conducted safely in the future. A proven record of 3,000 shipments covering 1.7 million miles with no impact on public safety or the environment demonstrates we can transfer this material safely.”
Used-fuel containers must pass rigorous tests by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission including:
A 30-foot free fall onto an unyielding surface, which would be equivalent to a head-on crash at 120 miles per hour into a concrete bridge abutment;
A puncture test allowing the container to fall 40 inches onto a steel rod six inches in diameter;
A 30-minute exposure to fire at 1,475 degrees Fahrenheit that engulfs the entire container; and
Submergence of the same container under three feet of water for eight hours.
If that’s not sufficiently comforting, there are also transportation tests to verify container integrity, consisting of:
Running a flatbed tractor-trailer carrying a container into a concrete wall at 84 miles per hour;
Placing a container on a rail car that was driven into a concrete wall at 81 miles per hour; and
Placing a container on a tractor-trailer that was broadsided by a train locomotive traveling at 80 miles per hour.
In all cases, post-crash assessments showed that the containers — although slightly dented and charred — would not have released their contents. One wonders how the thousands of tanker trucks transporting deadly chlorine and bromine gases would stand up to such conditions.

Wednesday, July 23, 2008

Post58. Emptied.

Thursday, July 17, 2008

Post 57. Homosexuals need not be Sarcophiles.

Please, let us not confuse Homosexuals with Sarcophiles, thereby vilifying the former.

sarcos, word used by St.Paul
in his Letters
for " flesh" in relation to
fornication and uncleanness.

Allow me also, please, to put temporarily away God's Clown and to put on the Templar,
a barbuto of course.

In the Name
of the Father
and of the Son
and of the Holy Ghost.
Allelujah, Maranata et Amen!

Title of the Essay.

Let us cross the “ t ”s and dot the “ i ”s
and call a spade a spade.
Shall We?

I have promised Douga I would have written a Post just about word definitions in relation to the critical issue of sodomy and gomorry which I suggest should be called more inclusively, as sodomy is an archaic term that does not reflect the advances and progress made since Paul times in this field of human endeavours. Sarcophilia or the love of carnal knowledge by any of the genders, including the hybrids and the transvestites, irrespective of gender, age, body-organs targeted, positions, means and ends ( i.e., just think about fist-zotting [ Hulalaaaa! Hay. Ouch! Take it easy will you bugger? Thou art divine, Phoebe. What a darling! Crap all over! ] for example, which I recently learned about from a french serial shown on SBS on Thursday nights).It appears that those interested in confusing this issue resort to thepractice of attaching to words which should have an innocent, natural and otherwise normal and harmless meaning, meanings which were not meant originally to be implied by the use of the word, in an attempt to make these practices to look normal, harmless, natural and healthy.
In addition to the above aims, just consider that by cunningly and diabolically adding to innocent homosexuals, the filthy sarcophiles, sarcophiles widen their power-basis that can be usefull at democratic election-times and for the purpoise of lobbying Parlamentarians.
Do not forget that, in our modern democracies ruled by Pizza and Mafia Barons,
what counts is the number of voters and cash on hand for discrete bribes ( in the form of donations to electoral campaigns).
As Paul of Tarsus says at Romans 11:7 -:.....the rest had their sensibilities blunted.The people Paul of Tarsus refers to in Romans 11:7 ( I suggest to call them the sarcophiles, meaning the lovers of carnal knowledge for the sake of a distorted, twisted, deviant search for carnal pleasures of the XXXrated sort, irrespective of gender, age or the bodily cavities they hunger to penetrate and defile) who are trying to confuse others, do so because they lack the humility to admit they are sick and deviates. This includes the deviant Anglican Bishop who is living in partnership with a man with whom he acknowledges the propriety to have carnal relations of some distorted sort with, or at least this is the impresion he is goiving and advocating. This miscreant has the arrogance to ask Jesus to impress His own heart on his defiled one. Get out from the Church! They are in fact arrogant and full of pride under a mask of compasion, love and a fulness of a spirit ( of the bung hole ) which is inspiring them, and believe that, since they may even be succesful members of our societies in many other respects ( we have got among them professional people of various descriptions, in politics, government, in the communication media, actors, clergymen and women, high ranking military personnel, etc. ) they cannot admit that they may be flawed in this respect, in relation to their unbridled, obsessive lust for carnal knowledge ( called by Paul of Tarsus uncleanness to differentiate this from straight out natural fornication ), which is anyway a product of their twisted and sick imaginations, ending in illusion and delusion as age takes its tall and they find themselves unable to indulge in their sick passions whilst deprived at the same time of natural feelings of affection that are not based on carnality.They become in fact desperate people.As the prayer “The Our Father” concedes, God’s opponent’s will rather than God’s own is allowed to have some authority on earth, until the “ Last Day “ of which St. John speaks in his Gospel. This does not however mean that the opponent’s will is unsupervised and unchecked. Not at all.God does not abandon His/Her/ITS own.However, this means that these peddlers of carnalities are allowed some degree of freedom and apparent success, however being deprived of natural and lawful sensibilities which in itself is altready a punishment as it reduces they humanity increasing their bestiality.Strangely enough, they even find angelic and beautifully endowed persons, even women, who like them.But these people have the beauty of a young braying donkey.So far i ave explained why the correct term for these people of both genders should be sarcophiles.
I shall now try to show why the words generally used to define sarcophiles, who may also be homosexuals, however not necessarily so and equivocally, since there are some among the sarcophiles who may even become obsessed with any flesh ( in greek sarcos ), as in the case of bestiality when a human being is driven by obsessive drives to like animals, i.e., the terms homosexuals and lesbians, may be misleading and tending to mormalise, to legitimise, to make these mental ( sometimes resulting from hormonal dysfunctions, therefore needing treatment ) illnesses appear as being states of normal believing, being, willing and acting.What worries me most is the ACTING. You can believe, be, will , act whatever you like provided you do so in your privacy, but the moment you start coming-out trying to peddle your filth in the open, attempting to normalise, legitimise, so that you may proselityse and corrupt my kin, then, if I can, I shall denounce you for what you really are, you oh DECIEVERS.
Let us have a look at the word Homosexual. The word Lesbian which also may have sexual, carnal implications which go beyond just LIKING, to CARNAL OBSESSION ( dildoing, etc. is still carnal as it can do mentally and physically the same as actual carnal knowledge) and may therefore also be a form of SARCOPHILIA, is an unnecessary word, probably demanded by our feminists who want to obsessively stand-out in separation from men, not because they necessarily hate men, but in order to just express their anti-Patriarchal feelings.
There are in fact various kinds of feminists. The basic fact remains that a Lesbian may in fact be just an Homosexual who has gone further-on into sarcophilia, a sick woman. The word homosexual should just denote normally, someone, a human being of any of the two genders who likes , has a somehow biased attraction for his/her own gender. By itself it may be perfectly harmless. A feminist must be, at least homosexual, however she can also be either heterosexual at the same time or be a right out male-hater. If she beliueves in the Scriptures she may also be anti-Patriarchal and advoicate the total re-writing of the Scriptures. Again carnal knowledge of any sort does not have to be an issue yet if one is involved in gender relationships only at a level of liking. In so far as Liking alone is involved, the issue does not appear to be so grave.
It is only when one begins to talk about Love and Passions that the issue becomes dangerous to a society.
What does Love really mean?Does it have to necessary imply carnality as sick modern societies understand in relation to the use of this word?The Scriptures advise Loving your neighbour, irrespective of gender. This is normality which even general common sense supports.This does not surely mean one should feel a compelling need and drive to stick it up ( whatever ) your neighbours’ body cavities?One may always fantasize if so inclined, but in so far as actually doing it that is not scripturally or even common-sensically allowable.It is when Loving is concerned then that the problem arises.Here again the DECIEVERS have achieved the generally implied development of a connection between carnalities of all sorts, including sarcophilic ones( involving any flesh whatsoever, gender etc.), and the word LOVE, through centuries of misuse and abuse of the word LOVE in literature, theatrical shows, the film industry, TV, CDs DVDs, virtual realities, artificial love-making devices though the PCs and special vests worn, being developed by notoriously insensible ( Romans 11:7) Japanese digital gurus, etc. Modern masses always and necessarily imply carnality whenever the word LOVE is uttered even in connection with angelic looking, asexual, anorexic, de Laurents-models and babies in their diapers full of poop.Loving in its original meaning implies a stronger attachment than just liking. It can even extend to natural and lawful carnal knowledge, which is normally related scripturally to the issue of Procreation and must be responsible ( i.e., LOVING) in so far as support for the mother and the offspring is concerned.However the ancient, all important, dominating concept of procreation in the Scriptures was not so much related to the word LOVE ( between woman and man) but to the DUTY of Providing an issue to the Patriarch to perpetuate the Family’s name in the Tribe and the right to hold land ( ha heres A Hebrew tribal member fit to carry weapons in battle on behalf of the tribe was called ish ha heres, i.e., ‘a landed man’, ‘the holder of land’, ‘a landowner’ ). The word LOVE already had even then a suspect connotation as it could refer to a morally dubious attachment, which could border on the scripturally unlawful, as when for example a man was driven to love an overwhelmingly attractive prostitute who had taken his will over like in the case of one of Jesus’ anscestors, who was tricked into procreating from his dead sons’ ( seven in a row died off withou having issue on behalf of Onan who used to spill his semen on the ground) widow.God acts indeed in mysterious ways.So, at one stage one can notice, if one is sensible ( Romans 11:7), the notion of DUTY in relation to LOVE to appear also in the Scriptures. God had even to resort to tricks in order to get one of his chosen ones to accomplish his DUTY. In this case, through the passionate LUST for his daughter-in-law whom he thought to be a prostitute, since she kept her identity concealed during the act.Maybe the reason for his seven sons’ refusal to seriously bang her was that she had bad breath as he still found her so madly attractive, as to pay a whole fattened lamb in exchange for her comforts, leaving with her as a pledge for payment-due his expensive woollen cloak as she had placed herself at a crossroads where prostitutes used to locate themselves in those days. Incidentally, at present, a good quarter of an XXX-rated pornographic film is about sperm-shooting or spilling. I personally cannot possibly even begin to comprehend the opleasure of sperm squirting. I must be stupid or abnormal.We might even end-up putting it on lasagne and spaghetti, considering that we cannot afford, in spite of and contrary to the Vatican’s opinion any world-demographic growth.It is also said that King David loved his concubines, his dancing girls, and so did his son Solomon or his happy-go-lucky-unlucky foolish, magnificently gifted but flawed Absalom.
I personally believe that God is beginning to feel tired and oppressed with all these humans, specially those fellows in Cosa Nostra who do anything, absolutely anything, even kill the Pope if required, for the purpose of propagating their kind, obsessed with marrying and sexual activities as if these were the only reason for humans’ existence. There is a reference in the Pentateuch to a similar scenario in the past when God got fed-up with exactly the same type of attitude and drownwd the lot. Good riddance. I might have my wires crossed but the passage is there. Vatican, the Baptists ( this includes poor Douga, the Anabaptists or vice-versa), the Seventh Days Adventists, the Church of Mickey Mouse and that of the Divine Lasagne might have a plausible platitude, in order to explain away these verses in favour of further unlimited marriages and procreation, in an overpopulated world, but I am getting wary. The churches have had to somehow give in and exercise compassion etc. etc. the maudling, complaints and demands for further concessions never ending, rising even up to God the Father Who is in the Heavens.Otherwise continuous blackmailings from the believers who wish freedom of pleasures and satisfactions, i.e., fragmentations of christianity and the drying-out of the incoming cash which is increasinglt being held by the greatest breakers of the law.The Old, Ancient aristocracies among which much Wisdom still exists, and admittedly as in every class of people, corruption too, never so much though as in present modern democratic societies which therefore stand condemned by what has become their usurpations of power as one would expect through changes something better than prior to the usurpations. All their cash as well as their properties have passed into the hands of Mafiosi of various descriptions.So, the West is really depending on its Mafiosi for reform.But they are congenitally incapable of Civilised Reform as they are basically goat-herders and shepherds from the steppe of Asia brought into Europe by the Romans who have through cunning and survival and infiltration risen to the top. Good luck to ourselves then.
Carnal knowledge has been extended by modern man and woman to the purpose of mutually providing to one another carnal pleasures and dubious satisfactions. Imagine a Bishop or a Cardinal in high uniform and dangling golden chain complete with a large golden crucified Jesus, getting all worked up and his satisfaction from a beautifully plumpy woman meekly submitting to his lust or vice-versa a lady Minister or Priestess equally being banged ( or, vice-versa banging either him or her or both) for satisfaction by a tall, skinny, patrician looking, aloof Vicar, totally and painfully out of breath, similarly in full church regalia and apparell. This is the very stuff both Boccaccio and Rabelais, who came much later than the former, at the beginning of the new Era of the Renaissance when human beings began to learn to laugh again, loved to joke about, not because of a lack of respect for the persons or the activities, since we all know we owe to these activities our having been born at all, as I myself was saying that I too do joke, humbly copying the two Masters for the purpose of catharsis and exhorcism, lest we get ensnared in the fantasies and in order to keep a balance in a divided church. ( Watson, the ghost of the sergeant Templar who is one of my Guardian Angels, asks what the hell I am talking about ). I personally believe that God is beginning to feel tired and oppressed with all these humans, specially those fellows in Cosa Nostra who would do anything, absolutely anything, even kill the Pope if required, for the purpose of bangings and propagating their kind, obsessed with marrying and sexual activities as if these were the only reason for human-beings’ miserable existence. Not so, since sanctification is the primary purpose. There is a reference in the Pentateuch to a similar scenario in the past when God got fed-up with exactly the same type of attitude and drowned the lot. Good riddance. One can almost imagine Cosa Nostra to exclaim and say -:
" You cannot do this to me God? I burned 50,000 candles on the candle-burner for You in my life, my wife burned as many also, Peppino fasted every Friday by eating only
Salmon, Tuna and Caviar ! I only committed adultery once a week. I confessed every day and took Communion every Sunday! I always gave the Church 10% of what I made selling women and cocaine. Ye, true I had a few miserable illegal migrants murdered for their organs and made money by selling those too but, God every body is doing it all over Europe, God. I had to keep pace with the Balcanic bastards. Capisce? Eh! "
I might have my wires crossed but the passage is there. Vatican, the Baptists ( this includes poor Douga, the Anabaptists or vice-versa), the Seventh Days Adventists, the Church of Mickey Mouse and that of the Divine Lasagne might have a plausible platitude, but I am getting wary. The churches have had to somehow give in and exercise compassion etc. etc. the maudling, complaints and demands for further concessions never ending, rising even up to God the Father Who is in the Heavens above. Otherwise continuous blackmailings from the believers who wish freedom of pleasures and satisfactions, i.e., fragmentations of christianity and the drying-out of the incoming cash which is increasingly being held by the greatest breakers of the law. One even hears to-day about the rights of single mothers or homosexual couples ( of both genders ) to have children by artificial insemination by using donated sperm. Has anyone asked about the human right of the children to have a father following their growth? Why should they grow up without being asked their consent to have only a mother around? It cannot be done since they cannot speak up, the answer is. I'd like to say that Natural Law and common sensibilities would say on their behalf that, were they capable to express their feelings they would complain that their natural instinctive desire is to have a Father to rely on during their growing up. Moreover, what are the poor males supposed to do for lack of a minimum of sexual satisfaction, if this practice increases? To go to the massage parlors and risk STDs? Sharia Law and Islam may have to intervene here on behalf of God. This may be one of the causes of sarcophilia in societies in which Anglo-Saxons are prevalent and dominate morality. It may be a sickness induced by social and sexual stress induced in the male population by the abuses of freedoms without any consideration of the compensating corresponding moral duties. I predict many western men shall embrace the blessed and wise fornicating freedoms of Islam
( I am clowning a bit here), just as the result of these aberrations and amoral ( I am not saying immoral) abuses of freedom and pseudo human rights by some of our senseless and insensible throllopy women who adopt artificial insemination( Romans 11:7; this is yet another type, a very subtle and evil one, of the miscegenation of natural affections) which disregards the duties corresponding to the rights of a relationship. This is yet another example of the modern attitude to do violence to sensibility ( Romans 11:7 ), common sense and Natural Laws, which reliable religion rightly condemns ( artificial insemination ).
Concluding, in relation to non-carnally expressed homosexuality, this should not have the stigma people now attach to it due to the confusion resulting from sarcophiles trying to necessarily relate homosexuality to an implicit and inevitable drive to carnal experirences and choices in order to cunningly widen their desired basis of power. Homosexuality is in fact basically, under normal circumstances, purely about a preference in relation to the gender from which a person of either genders ( either male or female ) prefers to mix with for companionship or frienship. Under normal natural circunstances it has nothing to do with carnal practices and the carnal obsessions of the practicing sarcophiles.

I would therefore urge normal homosexuals to rethink their predicament, maintain their sensibilities (Romans 11:7) and withdraw from a diabolical alliance and association with the sarcophiles who are using you for their diabolical ends and aims.
Jesus used to kiss his disciples on the cheeks or even the mouth. We should therefore conclude he was an homosexual. Maybe Jesus was both homo and heterosexual or omnisexual as the ideal should be. " Love your neighbour as even you do yourself ", this is the second best Command from the Scriptures after " Love Jehovah your God with an unconditional and unmiscegenated Love ". French and Italian people use kissing, leaning on members of the same gender with their arms across their shoulders, pat one another affectionately without any sly implication of intending to proceed to further sick carnal practices. I had to stop doing this in Australia since, even a slight touch on a shoulder would have been interpreted as I having sarcophilic tendencies. I have reached a stage where I do not even dare to lightly brush a woman's shoulder with my hand ( I actually inadvertently do so at times, in a feeling of pure affection for my neighbour Julia who is a true Gentle Lady, strangely very un-Australian or perhaps I should rather say un-Gothic. I still cannot believe Julia is real and next door to me. Of course I live in a terror to perhaps offend her inadvertently with my clownish ways.) as this could be interpreted as an invitation to go to bed. I must, now that I have discovered a mild capacity for poetry, refrain from writing and dedicating bits of harmless poetry ( if these can be called poetry) to women, especially if married, I find I like, in the spirit of my favourite Literary Era of the Provencal Troubadours
.....del gentil cavalleresco amor cortese.....
of which Petrarca and even Boccacio were representatives, as the same vicious attitude appears to prevail of a suspicion that carnality or familiarity is intended. And one gets dirty looks which are rather depressing. I recently expressed my admiration on an e-mail addressed to an american authoress who wrote a book on Jesus and Mary Magdalene telling her I found her beautiful and desirable. I bet that she thought that I had expressed a carnal desire or intention. Australian footballers can however, paradoxically act normally, since they are thought to be, falsely in many known instances as sarcophilia is an epidemic in countries with a large Anglo-Saxon basis, to be beyond the suspicion of sarcophilia owing to their machismo, i.e., their obvious physical maleness.They can therefore hug, pat one another, do whatever they like, but only temporarily during the madness ( normality) induced by the games. This is probably a reason why football or drunkenness is so popular, since it allows the release of all suspicions for a time. Watson ils sons foux ces Australians! What I am trying to express is the warning that these bastards of cunning, probably also schizophrenic sarcophiles, as a minority, have been damaging normal social codes of conduct, behavior and relationships between the genders in a hole nation and culture, expanding now like a vast oil spot, to the whole civilisation. And if allowed, this is going to be on the increase.
Similar reasonings can be extended and applied to the word paedophilia.This word should only mean a LIKING of children without necessarily inplying a carnal obsession with their innocence,, nudity, flesh and body cavities.Yet even this word has been abused and commandeered to express some specialised sarcophiliac aberrations and obsessions, with the purpose of somehow legitimising, normalising these human mental illnesses by exposure. However this is a field in which most parents have been rising up in arms and protest. However in democracies everything becomes politicised unless isolated and removed on a bipartisan concurrence and consensus, from public decision-making through voting. Many issues should in fact be so classified in democratic societies as to not be allowed to be dragged to and exposed in a public debate of untrained and unqualified masses, where they would be subjected to the rule of numbers through voting and cash bribes.In fact, given a large enough number of activists and cash, even paedophilia and the related pornography could be legitimised in the long run, in the name of FREEDOM, HUMAN RIGHTS and related cash earnings, however never mentioning the dirty filthy most unpopular word ( I am being funny here oh esteemed readers )-: HUMAN MORAL DUTY to maintain and protect ethical standards which strangely or incidentally enough coincide with the eternal Wisdom contained in the Sacred Scriptures. In a similar way which applies to social relations between genders, many among us end-up being frozen in the presence of babies and children in spite of natural, normal, human liking for children, for the fear of being suspectd as possible sarcophiles.Even I, a normally undemonstrative person with adult members of the two genders limit myself to exclame and to be carried away in praise, at a distance though, when seing a beautiful child or baby, driven by my natural and normal human liking for children whom I consider miracles. The mothers can generally in these instances immediately recognise my naturality and acknowledge my expressions with beautiful smiles which are to me cathartic.Again these bastards, arrogant, sly sarcophiles have damaged natural relations even in relation to children who need praises and morale-building, especially their long-suffering, miracle-accomplishing, saintly mothers during the difficult stage of growing up in a fallen and corrupt world.
The loss of sensibilities of which Paul of Tarsus speaks at Romans 11:7 is first observed in a confusion of definitions and meaning of those who are being so punished by God whose vocabulary they try to impose on others, with a certain amount of success, since as I said above, many among them occupy respected and high places in our societies, many among them being even teachers.I would even go as far as to say that in some fields of work and activity one would not go very far unless one submits to this sort of degenerative thinking which is categorised, generalised, normalised as a love and respect of human rights and freedom.Notice however how there is never a mention of the word DUTIES.The word DUTY is feared like the Plague.And mind you, they are in their liberal, laissais-faire, ultra-democratic ways, the most charming, attractrive, con-men and women the world ever sees, with fantastic smiles and most beguiling ways, until opposed. Then one witness a reversal and Ostracism becomes their favourite weapon the weapon of moral and intellectual cowards, since, being confused, they would not be able to refute such an E even such a moidest and humble Essay as this, or write one of their own explaining their attitudes and aims, beginning from declared First Principles.Please note that these people have anscestors and have always existed ending by stealth and infiltrations by a slow crawling up the ...........at the top of the societies of their times whenever their nation reached a phase of decline and near extinction. Yes they are the harbingers of national doom and decay. Sarcophiles whom I include among a larger class of people I call the FUCKUMITES are in fact the harbingers of doom and disintegration.To-day, as everytjhing else, sarcophilism is a global issue. Buddhists, Islamists, you name it they have them too.Let them not fool you in making you believe they are better than us.Buddhists especially, not having an ethical code based on a personal, ethical God, are very similar to the Stoics of ancient Greece and Rome.The Islamists have no Universal, Catholic commitment except to a world dominated by an islamic directed and manufactured Theocratic Empire ruled by a multitude of Priests who become saints by merely memorising the Qu’ran without reason or understanding, wearing a little white hat and a white or black ghallabia without underwear though, so as to be facilitated in their DUTY to service their allowed four wives and increasing the population of Islam.Their system of morality, I would not call it Ethics, allows them to exercise double standards of morality ( that is where Mafia morality has originated from in the days when Sicily was under Saracenic Rule, before the conquests of Federic II of Germany and those by the Normans. One standard is to be used for Moslems, the other for whoever is not and threfore expendible and taxable.Of course one cannot see this in Malaysia where a big show is being made to fool us or gullible Rudd. I am not advocating we muster them and shoot them, but that we advise them and compel them to seek psychiatric help. Of course, how do you instill in these megalomaniacs, many of whom are wealthy succesful professional persons, undoubtedly skilled ( skill is not necessarily the true, highest form of intelligence tha borders with Wisdom) people, the necessary true humility, not the fake suavity they are able to show offby being the good actors they are?One way God deals with God’s opponents is to abandon these to their illusions/delusions to show the inevitable end to which their ways drive them to. It is nort sufficient to look at deviant carnal practicioners when young and in the midst of their selfish oblivion of normality. one has to follow them up as they become old and the abuses of their youth begin to catch up with them.This is the meaning of Romans 11:7.One sign that these self-deluded people have lost their natural and common sensical sensibilities is their confusion in relation to word definitions.Take for example the word-: Homosexual.Everyone in our sick societies, when hearing this word, immediately implies a person who is an homosexual indulges in carnal miscegenations by either having sexual knowledge of people of the same gender and using bodies cavities which have not been meant for these sexual purposes, even choosing to do so when having sexual knowledge of a member of the opposite sex.However, sexual physical distinctions are related to gender.Homosexual should mean that someone likes people of the same gender in either the case that one is a male or a female. There should not be the need to have another word, i.e., Lesbian to denote a woman who likes women.Note that I have refrained on purpose to use the verb To Love and have limited myself to use To Like.The opposite of homosexual is heterosexual, which refers to a person who likes someone from the opposite gender.I hope this short Essay may achieve its purpose of reversing the evil, preventing a further decay of our society, by converting sarcophiles to the idea that they need all the help they can get and to stop damaging social relations by confusing these through their semantic( i.e., word-meaning) abuses.Amen!

Tuesday, July 15, 2008

Post 56. An Ode to Faded, Tight-over-the-crotch, Bleu Jeans.

( Dedicated to my favourite bleu jeans-wearer, G.Y. , a lady-blogger, who has the most beguiling arctic-bleu, roundest, bleuest eyes with the bimba-looks of an eternally innocent, after-orgasmic contentment. If you know what I mean.)
An Ode to Faded and Tight-over-the-crotch, Bleu Jeans.
The praises I wish to sing of
the icon that now sways
both West and East
about our male wits.
Many an invention has it spurred
with its utilitarian twist
that makes both genders
wear it as if
Unisex were Holy Writ.
Even the Vatican
has wisely endorsed it,
since it can, uncannily,
and paradoxically alike,
more babies stimulate
the genders to spin,
so as, as even Cardinal Pell
of Sydney, in Australia Fair,
the grey Eminence,
concernedly assures us all,
that in the West,
more babies are needed
in order the demographic growth
to balance-out with the East
where more vigorously than in the West
fornication is indulged in.
That is in fact the secret reason why
Australia has imported so many
of the people from the East,
including those who Salam Cafe’ favour
and all its crappities, crudities and nonsensities.
More babies are needed in Australia Fair, you nitwits!
So get down to it, vigorously, the task to fulfil.
"Do not worry children of my soul,
don’t worry about water and energy,"
says the Cardinal.
"Regarding water,
we can always import the mineral from Europe
blessed if need be, by papal hands for free,
to have our showers with.
Energy is not a problem,
as, with more babies
one can always have plenty of human power
to move the cogs of our Economy.
Back to the Middle Ages shall we return
happily singing with Bob Brown
and the Dalai Lama
and all the Greens too,
under the May-Pole Tree.
Who knows if perchance
the fate of Tibet
shall be Australia's own too.
All good and pleasant things must always end.
Let us return to the subject of this song
that was the icon
that mightily moves both West and East,
more even so than both
the Internet and the PC,
Bill Gate the wise
also concurring with this.
The icon is nonetheless than
the humble Bleu Jean
which dear old Levi,
of Israel a worthy
and good patriarcal son,
as soon as resettled in his New Jerusalem
which the Italians called Broccolin,
devised originally for rough-riding,
pale-faced cowboys to wear
under their leather outfits,
which of cutting and sharp thorns took care,
so as to better contain and restrain
their bursting oversized balls,
bursting for the want of use
as the Far West was once a women-less waste,
however, the Bleu Jeans
soon changed and corrected all this,
while at the same time also
strong enough
to fulfill the function that
the Templars’ ball-suspenders of old,
were wanted to do,
carrying out the protecting function
that restrained opponents
to grab one's balls in any close conflict
to unlawfully gain a contest by deceit.
Levi used to make these for a dollar a piece,
the poor soul, not ever guessing how popular
and ubiquitous these would have been.
He cunningly reinforced these
with little copper studs
that made the vain cowboy look
as if more bemedalled
than even a russian returned soldier indeed
who needs two comrades
to help him march in a parade
for the weight of the vast
of his medals the array.
Eventually, to cut the tale short,
the Jeans caught
of the feminists the attention,
who quicly, on the spur, decided
in their usual aggressive ways
to adopt the Jeans as an expression
of their equality and supremacy
over even the patriarcal race.
However God who is on the patriarcal side,
this being the weaker side
and of the NT the God must
to his Son be true,
Who the weak and meek loves most,
saw all and said-: " Ha, ha! Thou shalt not prevail.
Tightly and more revealingly
then even the skirts
can suggestively only do,
thou shall wear them oh of Eve the daughter.
Tight, very tight and close,
so as to reveal, but just so,
the little jewels thou have been
graciously and undeservedly provided with
by the cunning and all-knowing
Arts of God Who created Thee.
Is there a need to further proceed
in the spinning of this tale
that can verified be
any time and everywhere
a Bleu Jean is
that any cunning female of the human species
wears with so much deceit?
Even I a Templar
halas!, now sexually at rest,
blessing everyday
the peace that this means
---many poor sods are known
to blow their brains out
in spite of their wife, mistresses,
salami, home-made sauces, offspring
double-storey, triple-fronted,
balconied mansions
for the want of stimulation---
yes, I was saying, even I,
I must forsooth confess,
still am, just for an instant though,
all bamboozled by the sight
of a tightly-worn,
strategically revealing, while hiding,
the hints of what is
that miracle that God invented
which Rabelais, the french priest called
"the solution of all continuities ",
and that the Orientals call "the Jade Gates ".
Rabelais indeed,
who lived when,
in the Renaissance of human spirit,
man began anew
to dare and play the clown
after the neo-spartan rigours
of Middle-Aged restraints
that to no avail
improvements to morality could bring,
for want of charismatic laughter,
that even God enjoys on High,
that is why He/She/IT
created me a holy clown to wit.
Rabelais as I was saying,
in one of his light and clownish moments,
while resting from the rigours
of trying to bring down from Heavens,
the sacramentally enclosed God
Who is said in the Holy Host
to renovate the miracle of Salvation
through an eternal renewal of Sacrifice,
that the Bleu Jeans
wrongly understood and interpreted
can forsooth cause the unaware to need,
but everyone needs it anyway
as no one is innocent at all,
as the Scriptures and even Paul of Tarsus agree with,
if Cardinal Pell’s subtile thought
is not fully understood.

Friday, July 11, 2008

Post 55. What a Clap and a Crap!

What a Clap and a Crap!

( From an Article from Good News of the United Church.)
Sexually Transmitted Diseases ( STDs).
Sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) continue to plague America.
For example, the U.S. syphilis rate rose for the seventh straight year in 2007, driven by a continual surge in cases among homosexual [ carnally active homosexuals ] and bisexual men, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention ( CDC) said on Wednesday...............................................................
Homosexual and bisexual men accounted for 64 percent of syphilis cases in 2007 "
( Reuters, March 12, 2008 ).
CDC authorities are concerned about the increase risk of those already afflicted with syphilis being more susceptible to contracting AIDS virus and more likely to pass it on to others.
CDC epidemplogist Dr.Hillard Weinstock stated,
" Syphilis can increase the likelihood of HIV transmission from two to fivefold".
Condoms are not true safeguards against disease transmission, while
premarital abstinence and monogamous marriage are.
Dr.Weinstock also stated the oibvious-:
" Having multiple sex partners and other high-risk behaviours, like not using condoms, do put you at a higher risk to HIV and syphilis.
" Of course, condoms are not true safeguards against disease tramsmission, while premarital abstinence and monogamous marriage are ".
Young women are very much at high risk from STDs as well. An Associated Press-report stated that
" at least one in four teenage girls nationwide has a sexually transmitted disease ", with human papillomavirus (HPV), a virus that causes cervical cancer, by far the most common ( March 11, 2008 ) !!!!!!!!".
Research indicates that nearly half of sexually active teenage girls are infected with an STD at any oine time ( Souces-: Associated Press, Reuters ).
This must be Armageddon!
Conclusion-: YACHhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh!
What a shiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiit!
Sex is becoming like playing Russian Roulette with a revolver with five instead of six bullets!.
It is getting worse than even the times of King Henry VIII, called " Dripping Cock-Harris".
To think that it all started with some drunkard lonely man dilly-dallying with, brutalising poor, defenceless plump Llamas and Chimpanzees, perhaps even Orang Outangs.
You bugger!
There was no RSPA then !.

Post 51. To an Aussie Chrysalis.

To an Aussie Chrysalis.
Gentle chrysalis that,
with searching and longings
now my dreams
of Thee shall fill,
fraily waiting and dormant,
yet eversensing
such as when in their light sleep
the Muses their spare time spend,
beauty to spin anew and Fate alike,
Thy icon suggests to me
a soft, warm, silky coccoon
wrapping up as if within royal fine laces
a precious human gem,
bursting with tenderness
cheerfully curious about
the mystery that life is.
Perhaps, perchance,
someday far off
open the coccoon shall be,
the shining, vibrant, fluttering butterfly within
that, halas!, would also remind me
of dear lost Cindy,
to freely roam the fields to allow,
----life is full of
and made to seem longer
by such regrets as these----
even if for a short,
too short a summer day
that our human life is,
measured against
God and Eternity.
Requiem das nobis, Domine!
May Allah give us rest!

Post 50. The Trend to Apologies.

Apologies by the Queen to the Australian People.
Following the glorious example given by our glorious leader Mr. Rudd, in the offer of apologies on behalf of the australian people to our poor victimised Aborigenes, regarding the issue of the separation of aboriginal children from their families for the purpose of civilising them, I would like to suggest that an apology be tendered by our glorious Queen to the people of Australia, regarding the deportation of so many British citizens in the eighteenth century to the australian exhile for the purpose of their reformation.
It is in fact believed that many descendents from Fisrt Fleet-deportees still feel traumatised by their anscestors’ sufferings and deprivations and that these apologies would have a beneficial reconciling effect on the relations between the great Australian people and the English.
This would then open up a series of world-wide apologies which may facilitate peace and good-will among the nations of the World.
Rudd you is the greatest!

Post 49. Is Christianity Doomed?

Is Christianity Doomed?

Is Christianity Doomed?
The UK's Telegraph asks following a poll in which half of all Britons believe the religion, along with Judaism, will have disappeared from the country in a century's time. The article also cites a decline in the church attendance.
Obviously, the US would likely show more confidence in religion, but polls show similar slips in religious affiliation and church attendance. The question is, will this be a permanent effect, or is it simply a post-millennial slump? (One clue might be found in the increasing interest in Buddhism, a religion that focuses more on humanism and awareness than on faith in a deity.)
Tuesday June 24, 2008 comments (4)
from About.com
Jennifer's Alternative Religions Blog
From Jennifer Emick,
Your Guide to Alternative Religions.
FREE Newsletter. Sign Up Now!
Contact Information.
249 West 17th Street
New York, NY, 10011

Post 49. Of Lies.

I cannot stand lies about lies, that is lies compounded. However, I am so naive or stupid as to not know that the governing of a modern nation in a fallen world in which some civilisations have adopted ideologies which make of double morality a virtue when followed in the national interest, some lyoing may be acceptable. of course, once one allows the tiger out of the cage, who is going to control it?
That is a separate issue.
The bulk of australian voters have notoriously short memories, probably as the result of quasi-genetic modifications to their brains due to the abuse of alcohol during centuries of affluence which allowed the cursed substance to be widely availble at the levels of society aping their elites ( i.e., the English Lord or Scottish Laird) in the use of highly volatile spirits.
Now, of course, the rising price of fuels in general might help to cleanse the addled brains of the moronic 70%+ .
Allelujah! Praised be Allah the most compassionate and forgiving One!
So, let me remind you, my dear fellow Australians, that in the days when Howard/Costello/Downer/Nelson et All ruled the sandy wastes of this arid land,
which is getting more and more parched everyday, the above mentioned set of Wizards of Oz had at one stage offered 10 billion dollars to the States in the days when sabotaging Brack ruled Victoria for the purpose of trying to revive the almost totally zotted Murray Basin.
Brack refused, and thanks god removed himself sometime after.
Praised be Allah for his self-removal.
My undestanding of politics, especially the upside down ones, switched sides, reverse-mode type, carried out in Australia is very limited I must confess.
So, I might have my wires crossed here as an australian saying goes. See? Crossing-overs, upside-downings, side-swipings, reversals, etc. are part of the culture and therefore of the politics.
So I might be standing to be corrected.
Be my guest.
I wish Yamarka were more active instead of being walkabouting in the Nullarbour-Never-Never, dreaming about ladies with big..............
I am now getting to the point-:
Rudd and his cronies have recently released or promised to release 4 billion dollars for the Murray Water Resources, stating that the previous Government never attempted anything about this problem.
It appears to me that this is a blatant compounded lie which is extremely objectionable and damning coming from a man who began his escalation to power on the back of Bonhoeffer, the alleged political lies from the Liberals about AWB, his dayly attacks on Howard asking for a solution to the problem of rising petrol prices, etc. etc.
Rudd and his clowns must be capitalising on their masses’ notorious short memory, or their preoccupation with their mortgages, drinking ( forgetting ), football, betting and fornicating etc. etc.
Incidentally, regarding the problem of mortgages, why don’t australain politicians
blame the unrealistic expectations of most home buyers who expect to buy houses far too large uneconomical and expensive to manage in relation to their relaIncidentally again, since we mentioned AWB, do Australians realise that Australia being a small nation, which is self-pamperedly gutsing most of its national product on itself, ( forget about the propaganda about the big country which is all about potentialities not actualities), not being able to build anything really noticeable about Defence Forces, having to rely on some powerful ally to even imagine the possibility of defending itself in the future, Australia has nevertheless the equivalent of weapons and military resources in its potentiall for the production of foodstuffs?
The next war if not determined and ended in the first few days, may still see lots of conventional warfare with armies and surviving populations and armies and populations have to eat.
If ended in the first few days then there shall be no problem to solve.
So, Australia should capitalise on and maintain agricultural productions going at all costs and thgis means simply NEW ENERGY and NEW WATER.
At present, there appears to be a feeling of false security spawned, and peerhaps it is even being fostered by our potential competitors, that mineral resources are the main solution to our economics.
Short-term-wise yes, but we must re-invest most of the revenues accruing from the mineral resources into New Energy and New Water.
And tell the Greens, Don Brown, the Dalai Lama and the Tibetans, the blind fools, to behave.
It is only in so far as Australia is able to have a large yeld of foodstuffs that a powerful Nation, worthy of our high standards of morality ( hopefully ) shall be interseted in an alliance.
My opinion is in fact that, even during the last WWII Australia’s contributions to the war efforts in relation to foodstuffs and essential resources was far more valuable than the one afforded by its small field forces.
Also remember that foodstuffs can be seen as biofuel.
So, Rudd and your cronies, please do not sabotage our agricultural production and do not discourage our wheat farmers on petty issues of internal politics and watch out for ethnic infiltrators wrongly influencing and determining our political choices.
As Fraser said-: Life was not meant to be easy.

Post 48. Of Large and Little 'O's and Homosexual Anglicans..

Sometimes I sit and wonder
in analogies drifting like
smoke does, randomly,
like a fat gaseous cloud,
patrician looking, all white,
with just a twinge of grey,
that carbon emissions betray,
to better contrast the immensity
of the bleu sky around,
in contemplations immersed
of self-possessing doubts
wartching the red vastness of
the Nullarbour plain below
of Yamarka and of the Ten Canoes-people
the incomprehensible delight,
too much sunlight on bare headed skulls
when still young,
for the want
of a good bush hat I guess.
Strangely enough
my everlasting obsessions arise
of how the Arabs for Salam Cafe’s
now highly noted and
in even greater repute,
could have the brains to discover
of the big Zero,
the vast array of virtues and uses.
Especially I, the gaseous cloud
which aforehead I talked to you about,
rememberst thou?
I wonder of why,
while the West chose
the Zero to appear as a big ‘ O ‘,
like a big holy halo
or to be more earthly bound,
even like onto the large,
bovine, arctic blue eyes of G..Y.
which looking up at you
as if in eternal and innocent wonder,
don’t you be fooled by them, o stranger,
stir your innards like a gallon of castor oil,
the Arabs decided that,
perhaps more wisely and fittingly than the West,
that the zero should rather be shown
as a fig-shaped, twisted, squashed,
suffering smalll ‘o’, an ‘o ‘ that has been
traumatized by some sodomitic experience
all contracted and twisted
as if out of a sodomitic spasmodic and spastic
orgasmic gasping,
just after an aggravating cracking
induced by vigorous farting
induced by loud laughing
brought about by Salem Cafe’s poor antics,
not to mention the more subdued and discreet ones
resulting from effeminate Anglican chantings.
Honny Soit Quy Mal Ye Pense.

Post 47. The Rise and fall of Moslem Spain.

I have just watched on the SBS TV channel The Rise and Fall of Moslem Spain. produced by some godforsaken Unity Group Foundation.
Again as usual, bias and lies.
Cannot Islamists ever come out clean, apologise for their retrogressive ways and try to make it possible for the west to accept them?
Whatever Islam has achieved in conquered Spain, including the Mosque of Cordoba, Granada and the Alhambra, etc. was due to the masses of Christian and Jewish artisans, artists, technicians, scholars, workers they captured when they defeated the Visigoths who were at the time the most progressive and cultured Barbarians at the fall of the Roman Empire of the West, the Gauls/Britons being second, the Franks coming next.. As a contrast, in North Africa were they fought and defeated the Vandals who, as the name implies were the most inrtellectually degenerated among the Barbarians during the same times, Arabs achieved very little, actually allowing all Roman and Byzantinian infrastructures to irreversibly decay and rot. As the result of their extensive conquests in all directions around Mecca the capital of the little province of Arabia called the Hejaz from which they spread out at the death of Mohammed in 632 AD, they collected all skilled personnel, killing off the warrior classes, castrating their offspring for the Harems, taking the best of their women in poligamous marriages.
So all this glamorising of arabic science to-day is a whitewash,. since most of arabian philosophy which was founded on Aristotle had a Jewish biased foundation that was eventually totally defeated in written and oral debates inj the days ot St.Thomas Aquina. It is all written down for anyone capable of checking.
Arabs, in spite of being responsible for most of the destruction of egyptian, latin and greek texts managed to put thir hands on some sakvaged works. They probably got hold of the medicinal treatises of thye greeks and carried out some further work in that field. Similarly for Astronomy.
Whaty annoys me greatly is modern Islamists trying to show their anscestors as victimised by the Christians while still having remauned the same, having not learneds aznything from history like their cousins the Jews.
Theocratic ideals are definitely out to-day and cultural blending and integration and synthesis is a must.. Yet both Jews and Islamists still covertly aim at remasining a nation within a host nation until the scenario a;;ows them to take over and impose their culture and religion on others.
Look at every islamic country and to Israel to-day and you can see how they make it impossible for any foreign group in their countries to do what they insist in doing in other people’s countries.
There is absolutely no reciprocity with islamists and dealing with them is one way track..
Every counrtry in islamic hands to-day, outside Saudi arabia has ever been arabic bvefore 632 AD.
Islamists goe as far as denying even their cousins and racial kins the Israeli, permanence in palestine when they could very easily accomodate the displaced islamic Palestinians.
The Rise and Fall of Moslem Spain is a covert and dishonest propaganda work financed by Islamists in so far as, among other issues it would take too long to discuss, it totally fails to show the islamic attempt of the invasion of France when the saracenic mongrels were thorougly defeated, actually treshed by a carolingian, Charles Martel atr the rwo days battle of Poitiers ( also Tours near Orleans,quite deep into France ) who had access to the formidable heavy romanised cavalry of the Roman/Britons from Brittany among whom de Ferrarii riders were famous. I can show you all their Coat of Arms which i have collected.
In the days of the liberation of Spain ( La Reconquista ) de Ferrarii knights were ubiquitous in Spain and the surname appears frequenyly in every equestrian Order of Spanish Chivalry (i.e., Calatrava, Montesa. etc.). I know what i am talking about bvetter than the mongrels professors bought to waffle half truths.
The fighting went on for a hundred years at least before the Islamists were fully trown out of France.
This simply shows the Arabs were not just interested in Spain, but aimed at all Europe since 632 AD and the subversion of the christian civilisation.
This is demonstrated by the 800-years-long struggle to overthrow Byzanthium and the attack of the Balkanic territories and of Eastern Europe, led bu the Ottomans in 1500 AD. However god spoke in 1500 and at the battle of lepanto in greek waters, the turkish navy was so thouroughly trashed never to rise again. There was no anglo-saxon there then and believe it or not Lepanto was mostly an italian engineered ( the italian marine republics ) success financed by Spain, with lots of german and spanish muscle.
Islamists always lie about Poitiers that occurred very early in islamic History, in 750 AD a few hundred years before the First Crusade that occurred in around 1100 AD.
The occurrence of the First Crusade is mentioned to their ingnorant people even to-day as evidence of western aggression. I read a work by Hezbullah.
How can one trust Islamists or even carry out diplomatic work with them or trust their treaties, just beats me.
Hitler and Stalin were pussy cats in comparison. That is why Genghis Khan massacred them and built mountains of skulls or buildings with their bones and skulls.

Yet australian media’s gurus ( i.e., effeminate Sergio Riviere, Negus, Lateline and 60 Minutes et all ) who should be the watch-dogs of this gullible, stupid and ignorant nation are being duped and an insignifucant an unknown chap as i has to blow the wistle. Wale up before it is too late you mongrels!
What are these imbecillic, one more so than the next, australian film editors selectors and critics doing, I ask? Who chooses them?
Take a pick and shovel and go and plant potatoes!
Or go back to shearing sheep you fools.

Post 46. Listen to Paul of Tarsus and LIve.

To Whomever may be concerned.
Please allow me qouting some of St.Paul of Tarsus’ verses selected from the New Testament
in relation to deviant sexual practices-:
Romans 11:7
The rest had their sensibilities blunted.
Romans 11:8
just as it is written: " God has given them a spirit of deep sleep, eyses so as not to see and ears so as not to hear, down to this very day."
Romans 1:26-:
That is why God gave them up to disgraceful sexual appetites, for both their females changed their natural use of themselves into one contrary to nature;
27 and likewise even the males left the natural use of the female and became violently inflamed in their lust toward one another, males with males, working whaat is obscene and receiving in themselves the full recompense, which was due for their error.
28 And just as they did not approve of holding God in accurate knowledge, God gave them up to a disapproved mental state, to do things not fitting,
29 filled as they were with all unrighteousness, wickenness, covetousness, badness, ...........................................................................
1 Thessalonians 4:7-:
For God called us, not with allowance for uncleanness, but in connection with sanctification.
Colossains 3:5-:
Deaden therefore your body members that are upon the earth as respect fornication, uncleanness, sexual appetites, hurtful desire and covetousness,
which is idolatry.
6 On account of those things the wrathh of God is coming.

Alleluja, Maranata et Amen!

Post 45. Between Good and Evil. ( translated article)

(This Post is an article from a magazine L'Espresso translated from the italian by the blogger )
This post is a translation from an article written by Vito Mancuso
who is Professor of Theology
at the University Vita-Salute at the san Raffaele of Milan.
published on an Italian magazine "L’Espresso".
Between Good and Evil.
Why is it the Creator allows us to suffer?
Theology is unable to answer,
while Benedict XVI contradicts Wojtila.
By Vito Mancuso.
On the 17th of Novembre 2007, the milanese branch of the Association of Catholic Medical Practitioners ( Amci ), presided by Giorgio Lambertenghi Deliliers, organised a day of discussions under the issue of " To us reaches the crie from innocent pain. What is the meaning of human suffering?" ( further information available from www.aimgroup,eu ).
Participants to the event were, among many others, Massimo Cacciari, Giancarlo Ravasi, e Vito Mancuso, who has sent to the Booksellers, just a few days before this event " The Soul and its Destiny ", edited by Raffaello Cortina, with a foreword of Cardinal Carlo Maria Martini.
It is not without reason that catholic medical practicioners feel driven to a need to reflect about the meaning of human suffering.
They are in fact the ones finding themselves at the front line facing the intellectual brain-storming which may end in shaking their religious beliefs.
It is they, the greater number of medical practitioners and biologists, those who are concretely brought to deal with life and death in their profession, who loose their Faith, as the result of witnessing the arbitrariness with which pain and death offend human life.
This is why it is necessary that Theology questions the reasons for pain and unexpected or untimely deaths.
Benedict XVI has stated in connection with this issue-:
" It is only through questioning as radically as Theology is meant to be radical, that one can hope to find an answer ".
In this case, to be radical requires that Theology poses the question upon a medical, scientific foundation, or point of view.
The question should therefore be-:
" What is the nature of and the degree of God’s participation, in so far as the making of the human body is concerned?".
The problem I wish to confront, as an example, is that of the physical pain that a human being has to suffer as the result of illness that arises from genetic causes which originate even in and while the human body is being created in the womb of the mother .
The Church proclaims that life is sacred since it originates from God, the Scriptures utter that it is by His/Her?Its very hands that God even moulds our very bodies.
Yet, the number of genetic illnesses so far catalogued is 6,000.
" What is the nature of and the degree of God’s participation, in so far as the making of the human body is concerned?",
becomes then a recurring question.
This question is part of the vicious circle presented by the Problem of Evil which has its roots in three unavoidable axioms requiring a synthesis-:
(1) God is Omnipotent and governs the world.
(2) God is Good and does not want Evil.
(3) Evil is a reality and exists as such.
However, whilst the logical synthesis of these axioms is necessary to solution of the Problem, it is not logically possible.
This is the reason why the Problem of Evil never ceases from disquieting a christian conscience.
On the basis of the above-listed axioms, the question regarding God’s participation in the creation of human bodies axiomatically becomes-:
(1) God has power and control over human bodies made by His/Her/Its own hands.
(2) God wills the physical good ( natural in contrast to the supernatural end) for each and every one of these human bodies.
(3) Yet there are human bodies which are born defective as irreversible failures.
All along the course of History attempts have been made to solve the Problem represented by the above given vicious circle which defies synthesis, by denying in turn each of the three axioms-:
(1) God is not really Omnipotent.
(2) God is not really Good.
(3) Evil is not a reality.
However the solutions achieved by denying any of these axioms is unacceptable by Christianity that can neither deny God’s Omnipotence and Goodness nor the reality and existence of Evil.
In fact, the doubts arising in believers in relation to these issues have clamorously come to public notice through the contadiction that occurred between the theological interpretations of John Paul II and of Cardinal Ratzinger.
John Paul II who wrote the book "Memory and Identity" asks the reason for the existence of Evil and says that-: ....evil is somehow necessary to the world and to human kind. It is a fact that in some concrete situations of human existence evil reveals itself to a certain extent useful, in so far as it generates the opportunities for goodness ". and he adds -: " Has not Goethe defined the Devil as: belonging to that systen of forces which, while acting evilly, always end generating goodness?"
To the contrary, Benedict XVI, who was then a cardinal, wrote-: " Evil is not at all, as Goethe wills us to believe in his " Faust", an aspect of the one system that has educational ends, but a force that seeks to destroy our being ?.
This clamorous contradiction between the two Popes is the most evident confirmation of the darkness in which traditional catholic thought about the Problem of Evil is moving, more specifically and at the same time paradoxically more complex, in relation to the original issue in this article, the problem of
" What is the nature of and the degree of God’s participation, in so far as the making of the human body is concerned?".
This is the knot that is strangulating the contemporaneous catholic conscience,
in particular the one of those, who, like health operators and workers, are every day confronting innocent pain.
The issue at a concrete practical level becomes the necessity to recognise that the knot at present consricting and restricting consciences in so far as possible solutions are concerned in relation to the problem of gnetically transmitted illness.
Intellectual honesty is going to be required in so far as a radical restructuring of Faith’s Foundations is going to be required.
Finally the choice is as to whether one prefers to protect conservative belief or whether one chooses to enhance the concreteness of human life.