Friday, September 18, 2009

Post 152. The Truth about Moses' Identity.

The Truth about Moses' Identity.
(mouse-click to enlarge please;
Ctrl + or - to change enlargement.)

( including Jacob, Joseph, Moses, Miryam, Aaaron
within the Genealogical Chart of
the 18th Pharaonic Dynasty ).
from pages 346, 347 of
Sir Laurence Gardner’s
“ Genesis of the Grail Kings ”,
with comments and evaluations
by Attilio Louis Ferreri,
Bachelor of Theology (UFT-Melbourne).

Notes-: Comments and Evaluations.

Note 1-: Mahalath ( or Nefru-sobek ), an egyptian princess of Royal blood, married Ishmael, the son of Hagar the egyptian slave of Abraham. Ishmael was the half-brother of Esau and Jacob, and as a widow of Ishmael, Mahalath married Esau, giving birth to Igrath, also of Royal blood, who became the second wife of Pharao Amenehmet IV (1797-1786 BC ), of the 17th dynasty, giving birth to daughters, including Zelekha and her sister the Dragon Queen, Sobeknefru or Sobekhkare, the latter becoming the wife of the last Pharao of the Sobek Dynasty, Amenehmet IV, son of the first wife Aat of Amenehmet III (1841-1797 BC ).
Note 2-: Aye (ca. 1352-1348 BC), the son of Yuya (Joseph ), became the first Am-ram ( see page 147, ‘ The Fire-Stone Project.’ in Sir Laurence Gardner’s “Lost Secrets of the Sacred Ark. ”). ‘Am-ram’ was a designation or title probably inherited by Aye from his father Joseph, as another name fo this designation became ‘ Joseph ha-Rama-Theo ’, phonetically corrupted to ‘ Joseph of Arimathea ’.
Note 3-: Smenkhare, the scriptural Aaron, married a second wife Elisheba, daughter of Aminadab or Amenhotep, son of Rama ( the Aram ) and of the latter’s marriage to Kiya-tasherit, daughter of MIRIAM, sister of Tutankhamun and had a son Eleazar who married the daughter of Nashon/Putiel, son of Aminadab. Hezrom was son of Pharez, who was illegitimately born from Judah and Tamar, however legitimated through his marriage to Barayah, a legitimate daughter of Judah.
David descends from Jesse, Obed, Boaz , who through Salmon, via Nashon/Putiel, originated from Aminadab, related through Elisheba, sister of Nashon/Putiel, to Aaaron back to the lines of Hezrom and Shelah, both sons of Judah, however intermarried with the lines of Moses ( through the marriage between Aminadab and Kiya-tasherit, daughter of Miriam ), related to the first Judge of Canaan, Othniel, from the line of Hezrom, to Bezaleel, the Master Craftsman ( who made the Sacred Ark), from the line of Caleb. Since Eleazar, born from the second marriage of Aaron to Elisheba married a daughter of Nashon/Putiel, and fathered Ahimaaz who was the first Zadok High Priest created by David, the Aaronic Priesthood of levitic origins and the Zadok one coincide.
So, both the Davidic Kingship, the Zadok High Priesthood and the Aram Craftsmanship
converge into the line of Jesus and James through the death without issue of John the Baptist.
Note 4-: The oppositions between Cain and Seth, between Esau and Jacob, between the precedence of Aten the Holy Spirit and Yehwah the Creator, are all resolved in Jesus of Nazareth.
However this coincidence has not been seen, understood and accepted by the Nations in the present world and various opposing alignments still linger on in opposition to the Holy Spirit which requires Peace and Good-Will between the members of human kind and between the latter and Creation.

Note 5-: Miriam is a very important biblical character mentioned in Exodus and Numbers, however diminished and obscured by the Hebrew Priesthood ( Yahwists ) of the post-Babylonian captivity, in ca. 538 BC. She is mentioned as the nameless sister of Moses in Exodus 2:7, as the sister of Aaron in Exodus 15:20 and in Numbers 26:59 as the sister of both Aaron and Moses. There is clearly something missing in the whole scriptural account of the origins of Moses, considering the magnitude, importance and influence of the biblical personality of Moses, which gives an impression and feeling someone is hiding something without an outright use of lies, uttering half-truths which can be excused as errors or ignorance, a practice similar to the later talmudic approach and attitude to morality and ethics, an attitude later on adopted by the Roman Catholic Canon Lawyers in support of Constantinianism, an attitude of expediency and plausability. The obscuration of the truth about Moses and Miriam has also been the result of the eradication of all records and inscriptions referring to all members of the 18th Dynasty by the last ruler of this Dynasty, an Egyptian general called Horemheb who became Pharao through marriage and one suspects, usurpation and intrigue, after the death of young Tutankhamun, whose existence was discovered through the accidental finding of his tomb. Please note that Akhenaten's tomb has never been found as he, if indeed Moses, was buried by the Israelites in the wilderness. Horemheb’s motivation was both a hatred of ATEN ( the Holy Spirit ), the God of All Unity and Oneness, and a seeking of popularity with the Egyptian, idolatrous, well-to-do classes. There is a much respected Book of Jasher known to biblical circles, which tells the truth and let me quote from “Genesis of the Grail Kings “ by Sir Laurence Gardner, who, although confused, unable to synthetise what he knows for our times, is an excellent guardian and narrator of the truth. I am quoting from pages 290-291-:
..................Outside the Bible, however, Miriam’s story is told at some length----particularly in the book of Jasher, a work not selected in the canonical Old Testament. It was not until after some time after the death of Jesus that the separate scriptures of the Jews were collated into a single volume and it was then that certain books were excluded because they were at variance with the compositional strategy. One of these was the book of Jasher-----a book so important to the earlier Hebrews tha it is still mentioned twice in the canonical Bible. The very fact that these references are to be found in Joshua 10:13 and 2 Samuel 1:18, indicates that Jasher was around before these books were written-----and they each claim that it was a repository of essential knowledge. But although not promoted by the mainstream establishment, Jasher has not been as historically secret as one might imagine. The 9-foot ( ca. 3 m) Hebrew scroll was a prize of the Court of Emperor Charlemagne ( AD 800-814 ), having been discovered in Persia [Iran] by the monk Alcuin, who later founded the University of Paris. As a reward for his discovery, Alcuin was awarded three abbeys and became England’s Archbishop of Canterbury.
In the fourteenth century, the British Reformer and Bible-translator John Wyckliffe(1320-1384 ) wrote “ I have read the book of Jasher twice over, and I much approve of it as a work of great antiquity ” . It is generally reckoned that Jasher’s position in the Bible should be between the books of Deuteronomy and Joshua, but it was
sidestepped because it sheds a very different light on the sequence of events at Mount Horeb. In person, Jasher was the Egyptian-born son of Caleb; he was brother-in-law to the first israelite judge Othneil( Judges 1:13 ) and was the appointed royal staffbearer to Moses.............................
The Israelites/Hebrews knew the truth but became obsessed with their racial hubris about their exclusive position in Creation as the physical Chosen People of Jahweh.
There is a further question a discerning, thinking reader of the Scriptures should ask as to why Moses or his sons Gershom and Eliezer were excluded from the Priesthood in favour of Aaron, if Moses had indeed been a natural/uterine brother of Aaron, rather than a baby ( a half-Egyptian cousin ) nursed and fed by Aaaron’s natural mother Tey, who was a Jewish woman of Levite descent. Moses was not a descendant of Levi, although rightly called, according to custom, a son of Tey, in virtue of her having been his feeding-mother, and his only Jewishness was second-hand, from his own mother Tiye, Aaron's paternal aunt, the daughter of a Jewish father, Joseph the son of Jacob who had married the Egyptian daughter of Potifarre the Priest of Ra’, his original master when a slave in Egypt.
Note 6-: AMRAM, RAMA, ARAM, RAMTHA, IMRAN, HA-RAMA-THEO, ARIMATHEA and Jochebed or Tey, Mose’ feeding-mother ( to be written later).
CONCLUSION-: The manipulations and obscurations present in the Scriptures are inevitable owing to the number and diversity of writers and redactors, each seing scriptural events from different angles, at different times in history, with different theological understandings, interpretations of the past, without a complete knowledge of the events, with different goals and world-views, an inadequate, defective understanding of physical categories, like power, force, work, energy and the relations of these to time, requiring modern Physics to clarify. Most contributors meant well and what we have received is still a miracle of God’s Communication and Revelation achieved with such biased and flawed tools.
As I observed above, in spite of all the obscurations and manipulations tending to minimise all influences other than those of the Hebrews of Canaan, it is clear Jesus’ anscestors included all participants, among whom even sinners were included, to the scriptural events in Mesopotamia and the Middle East, which shows the Holy Spirit DOES NOT DISCRIMINATE and loves to rehabilitate sinners, as in the end, there is no one innocent in relation to God ( see St. Paul’s Romans ). In spite of the efforts of Judaism to maintain the worship of Yahweh strictly an Hebraic Monopoly, Christianity became a universal Religion. It is time for Christianity to set some order in the Scriptures’ Interpretations, further honouring the wisdom of, say, Galatians 3:28, achieving and presenting a united Religious Belief to all other religious people in the World, this not to dominate but so as to act as an example of the praxis of Christian Ideals.
I, by nature a synthetiser,
cannot personally understand the malice of Jews and Moslems in rejecting Jesus as the Ultimate teacher when/once it can be shown how he descends from Juda through David, and that Jesus’ ancestors have also intermarried with most representatives of the ancestors of the Arabic people, and all Mesopotamic people in general.
A plausible explanation may be that Mohammed, while aiming at the eradication of animism and politheism among his people, chose a path of separation from and rebellion against both the Jews and the Christians, as a form of Protest, as a representative of the Arabic grievances against the monopolising attitudes of the Hebrews/Israelites who had made themselves into the Chosen People of Jahweh as a Race of the Human Species,
to the exclusion of all other mesopotamic religious and cultural contributions, rather than as the Ideal of a Spiritual Race, membership of which all human beings can aspire to, in accordance to Galatians 3:28. If this is true, it is time now for Moslems and Jews to join the Christians whose Reformations have clarified and somehow exposed the Hebrews’ misunderstandings.
This is why, although the ancient obscurations and manipulations have not damaged our present understanding of the Holy Trinity, having only obscured the essentiality and independence of the Spirit, and of the fact that the WORD is the Spirit operative in time and creation, perhaps both in Jahweh
*and Jesus, it is nevertheless important to correct these faults, perhaps by adding a few more Books to the present Canonical Scriptures together with the re-evaluation and, if needs be, the shelving of Dogmas.
This might require another Global Ecumenical Council to be convened.

* This would require theological research and evaluation as it is a totally novel insight of mine.
I mean that there is in my mind a possibility, that Jahweh may also, like Jesus, have been an homeostatic presence of the Word, as Spirit in Creating and Making, in a human being who may have been a human anscestor of both David and Jesus.


Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home